Saturday, January 3, 2015

rethinking the conversation on modesty

Yesterday I got a little rant-y on twitter, which is usually a pretty good sign that I have a lot of thoughts/feelings & need to blog it out. So, here we go.

It all started when my good friend Kathryn posted about buying new bras. A discussion ensued, which reminded me of a time when I was maybe 12 or 13, and we had gone to the temple to do baptisms, which involves getting wet & thus changing your clothes afterwards. She had a bundle of her clothes in her hand and we were talking to some of the other teenagers, when her mother came over and hustled us away, shaming her daughter for having her bra out in the open. "Those boys don't need that kind of education..." she told us.

I know that family, and I have great respect for them, and this isn't a personal attack or criticism. I wasn't scarred by this incident and I doubt my friend was either. But I do remember it. And now, looking back, I see it as a symptom of a culture that routinely shames women and tends to blame women for men's choices.

I don't think we need to parade our underwear around for the whole world to see, but accidentally seeing half a bra is not going to ruin a young boy's life/salvation/psyche/etc. Too often I think conservative Christian communities have crossed the line between avoiding sexual permissiveness, and over-shaming women and women's bodies. [for more on purity culture as a response to the sexual revolution and how it's based in fear rather than love and whole lot of other goodness, see sarah schwartz's amazing talk here]

To understand a bit more of where I'm coming from, know that I am big sister to three wonderful brothers & two amazing sisters, and that they're the most important people in the world to me. I grew up mormon (and still am), and I value the ethics my upbringing has given me. I'm grateful when girls choose to dress with modesty. I think modesty is a great thing. But I also think it's often being taught wrong.

Too often I feel girls are taught to "dress modestly so that boys will like you" or that, "you don't essentially become walking porn." (actual quote.) I don't buy into this at all. Yes, I understand that it's easier to focus on godly things when people around you aren't sexualizing themselves. But I also know that regardless of other people's choices, we can always retain our agency, our ability to choose and to refocus our thoughts. When my youngest brother was in high school, a girl went streaking [naked] down the halls and tripped and fell right in front of him. While I wish she hadn't made that particular choice, remarkably, my dear brother was still able to keep his morals intact. We always retain control over our own choices. Recently he told my mom that when people say "boys will be boys" or just assume that "all boys look at porn" it makes him feel "so clumped together and generalized and degraded" as a young man. "It makes me feel like people & society don't think I'm capable of controlling myself like I'm some kind of animal or something." I reject the "boys will be boys" mentality. Men and women are both fully human, and both children of God. [for more, see here.]

It is possible to teach modesty without making girls feel ashamed of their own God-given bodies. [for more on this, see the embodied project]. 

It is possible to teach righteousness without constantly framing it as "do this so that others [boys] will like you/respect you/marry you." 

[Spoiler alert: they won't always marry you. So you're gonna need a way better reason than that.] [Sarah Schwartz addresses this well.]

You need to be good for you and for God, not for any other person. Because other people change, and they go away, and another person's approval is SUCH a shaky foundation to build something as important as testimony upon. Instead, let's go with Jesus "The Rock" Christ. 

(not this rock)
(this Rock)






The most common argument I hear in opposition to this is that "to say our actions don't affect others is silly." or "but you can't ignore the fact that women's dress DOES affect men." And I hear you, I do. And I'm not denying that our actions affect other people, of course they do. I'm just saying that's a dangerous idea to frame the conversation around. I understand and appreciate that modesty makes a difference. I have 3 brothers. My family always appreciated it when their prom dates made an effort to dress with modesty. And I always appreciated it when they wore shirts to dinner. Respect for others is never a bad thing. But no amount of shoulder or leg showing was going to excuse my brothers for any inappropriate behavior. 

[I also make a distinction between personal and social responsibility. Personally, I choose to dress with modesty. That is my choice. Socially, I choose to not let other people's choices control my thoughts or my behavior.]

I'm not opposed to conversations about modesty, or even to talking about how modesty benefits other people. But too often I've seen it become a very gendered conversation, focusing on how women need to cover the shoulders and hide their knees and make sure their bra straps don't show because it will give boys bad thoughts. Never once have I heard boys be told to put on a shirt, or make sure not to leave their athletic cup out in the open because it will give girls bad thoughts. Maybe I missed out on these conversations because they were held in male-only settings, but somehow I doubt that. 

I cringe when dressing to help boys control their thoughts & not becoming "walking porn" is offered as the primary reason to dress with modesty. To me, helping others out is secondary. A benefit, but not a reason. 

Please can we teach women and girls that modesty is first and foremost about them and their relationship with God. If we're constantly making choices based on other people and what they think and feel about our choices, we're going to end up burdened with shame and burnt out and exhausted. The world is constantly changing and shifting. Every individual has different ideas and standards about what constitutes "modesty." Living to meet the world's standards is exhausting and pointless. As Carol F. McConkie has said, "Fashions and socially accepted behaviors change regularly. The standards of the Lord never change. Teach young men and young women to be sensitive to the Spirit as they make choices about what to wear, say, and do." Live for God. Live for His standards. He is constant and loving. A lifestyle centered around God and His loving expectations is so much richer and more fulfilling and without shame. And when we're consistently making an effort to live in a way that's pleasing to God, we will naturally do what's best for others as well - but in a much more rewarding way. That's why I view "helping each other out" a benefit, but not the primary reason for modesty.

I usually fall back on this quote from Lynn G. Robbins
"Trying to please others before pleasing God is inverting the first and second great commandments."
Keeping our priorities in order - living to please God first - helps us avoid so much stress and anxiety. Please can we begin to teach modesty in this way. I promise it will make everyone happier, and the results will be even better. In this way, we can take the blame off of women for men's choices, while still holding everyone to God's high & holy standards :)

Also, please can we remember that modesty is an attitude, not a dress code. I was encouraged by this recent article from Carol F. McConkie:
The definition of modesty in True to the Faith is “An attitude of humility and decency in dress, grooming, language, and behavior.” [emphasis mine]
"Over the years, I have learned that modesty is taught best by teaching the doctrine and setting a positive example... Modesty is a God-given principle that can help us learn to use our bodies appropriately here in mortality. The definition of modesty in True to the Faith is “An attitude of humility and decency in dress, grooming, language, and behavior.” Modesty is not vain or boastful. Modest people do not use their bodies or their behavior to seek approval from the world or to draw attention to their own real or supposed accomplishments or desirable attributes." This is the definition of modesty we need to be teaching our young people - boys and girls. She continues: "Please remember that the principles of modesty shared here apply to both men and women, sons and daughters."

I get nervous when it starts to feel like people have built their faith and their testimony on temporary standards (hem length, shoulder straps, etc) instead of eternal principles. As Ronald E. Poelman has said, "[Lev. 19:27] contains a rule about personal grooming . It is clearly not applicable to us. However, we also have standards of dress and grooming. Neither is an eternal principle; both are intended to help us implement and share gospel principles." [emphasis mine]. Remembering what the Lord's standards for dress and grooming are intended for will help us to keep proper perspective. 

I don't think the takeaway should be "...so everyone can walk around naked because feminism!!!" but I do think that there is room for remembering the true definition of modesty [attitude, not dress code] and not judging other people's efforts or blaming their choices for our own. 

Remembering that modesty is an attitude, not a dress code, reminds me that it's possible to be modest in a bikini, and immodest covered head-to-toe. [Lena from the embodied project covers this topic well; also i've blogged about this before.] 

It's cool if you're attracted to modesty, & it's cool that girls [& boys] know they don't have to dress a certain way to get boys [or girls] to like them, but that's the point - you don't have to dress ANY way - "modest" or immodest - to get people to like you. Do it for yourself & for God. 
It is totally within everybody's right to have a preference. I totally get that boys who are trying to keep their thoughts clean will prefer to hang out with women & girls who make that easier, and I respect that. It's probably helpful for some women who are making an effort to dress in accordance with God's standards to know that there are men who will respect that effort. But again, this is a benefit, not the main motivating reason.

We often hear that women who dress "immodestly" [which usually means "not how i think she should dress"] have no self-respect and are just doing it to attract men. Why do we only condemn this behavior one way? At it's root, it's the same problem - women being told "do this for men." No one should feel they have to dress a certain way for others. I don't have to dress "provocatively" to keep a man, & I don't have to dress "modestly" to deserve respect. They're two sides of the same coin.

I would also use extreme caution before categorizing a woman as "modest" or "immodest," or saying "she has no self-respect" since you simply don't know the condition of her heart or where she is coming from. It's super dangerous to look at anyone and think "Oh, they're probably this type of person, because of what they look like." I have made that mistake time and time again. I'm always wrong. And to fellow Mormons, be careful not to confuse "LDS Dress Standards" with "modesty." Remember that modesty is an attitude, not a dress code, and that it's possible to be modest in a bikini and immodest in a burka.

To quote further from Carol F. McConkie:
"Remember that even as we teach and exemplify modesty, we never condemn those who choose short skirts or “rainbow hair and the many splendored rings.” Always we exemplify compassion and Christlike love for the individual while we remain loyal to the standards the Lord has set." [emphasis mine]

At the end, of the day, I choose modesty. But my primary thought when I get dressed is not, "What will boys think of me?" but "Am I keeping the promises I've made to God and myself to represent Him at all times, things, and places?" (and, "is this comfortable?")

Personally I feel like our society puts an over-emphasis on bodies/looks as a source of power. I believe that power comes from who you are (eternal), not how you look (changing). I like to dress modestly because it reminds me of who I am and what really matters. It reminds me that my power doesn't come from what I look like, but from who I am, and that my worth is not attached to my appearance. I also like to wear leggings because they're extremely comfortable and I like the way they look & feel. At the end of the day, I have a much greater reason to dress modestly than just "what will boys think of me."

"I testify that the choices we make to appear and behave modestly send a powerful message that we understand our identity as sons and daughters of God and that we have chosen to stand in holy places.
[Are we] using our bodies to draw attention, or to glorify God?" // Carol F. McConkie

It's important to realize that we're all connected and that our choices affect each other and that we're here to help each other out. But too often I feel like a line is crossed, and suddenly a girl's self-worth and value is all tied up in what boys think of her and her relationship status. Enough. Women and men have value because of who they are - intrinsic, unchanging, eternal value - completely separate from what they can do, what they look like, or what they wear.

And the best way to improve behavior is to focus on that intrinsic self-worth.

When we are confident in who we are and in our unchanging self-worth, we are much better equipped to reach out and help others, knowing that their opinions won't change us. This is how the Savior acted. This is how I want to be.

Let's shift the focus away from what others think of us & towards our relationship with God.

Wednesday, December 10, 2014

mormon women & the priesthood & gender roles in the church

a friend of mine recently posted some of her thoughts on women & the priesthood & gender roles in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, & one over-long facebook comment later I realized that I, too, have many thoughts on this subject, & I wanted to preserve them here for my own future reference. :) this is basically verbatim from my facebook comment, so apologies for any lack of organization/coherancy. I just wanted to get it out there. Also, though I hold fast to certain truths (we are all children of God, for example) this is a topic on which my opinion is constantly shifting & expanding, & I would love to hear any opinions you may have on the subject :) [for a bit of background knowledge: read up on the priesthood]


First of all, I really enjoyed this article - it was very thought-provoking, & this line is still something I think about [emphasis added]:
"Because we live in a world where strength and power have always been defined by men, many think that they must be the same as a man to be strong and powerful. The idea implies that only what a man does is of worth, and therefore, if a woman wants to be of worth, she must become like a man. This is wrong. Women should be valued for what they contribute based on their own individual and differing strengths, not based on how much like a man they may have become."
My personal feeling is that hard & fast "gender roles" are harmful to individuals, and to society. I believe absolutely that God knew what He was doing when He created us. I believe I have always been a woman & that I will always be a woman. & I believe that God has a perfect plan for each of us, and that He has & will give us every opportunity & experience we need to become like Him & enjoy the happiness He does.

I don't think that this means I am inherently nurturing, just because I am a woman. I don't think this means men are not nurturing, just because they are men. I believe that as a child of God I have a spiritual heritage that it is my job to develop, & that God will give me the opportunities I need to do that. I worry about prescribing strict "gender roles" - in my experience this can lead to men & women feeling like something is wrong with them, like they're not a "good woman" if they don't naturally love children, or cooking, or homemaking, or not a "real man" if they don't love sports or cars or lifting heavy things.

As a missionary, I often felt "holy envy" for the elders (male missionaries who hold the priesthood). They could bless their investigators, no problem, they could baptize the people they taught, & their ministerial certificate sounded a heck of a lot cooler. But I've learned that women use the priesthood in a lot of important ways. As a missionary, I absolutely believe I used the priesthood - the power of God used to bless His children - every single day. I used to be so jealous of men who could give blessings, jealous that I would never know what that feels like. Then I realized, when I pray sincerely for the people that I love & care about, it's the same thing. I can call down the powers of heaven to bless people, and I can be inspired by the Spirit to know what to say. I had profound experiences that I know were because of the power of the priesthood - God's power to bless & save His children. God can work through me just as much as through any of His sons. Women can be leaders - great leaders! I was very encouraged by the addition of "Sister Training Leaders" in my mission

I don't pretend to have a perfect knowledge or understanding, but that's where I'm at today. I strongly disagree with the idea I've heard many times, that men are naturally selfish etc & that's why they hold the priesthood & women don't, or that women are naturally giving & good & kind & so we don't need the priesthood. I don't believe that's doctrinal, & in my experience it's not accurate. God gives us what we need, but we don't always know why, & it isn't fair to assume all women or all men are a certain way, simply because of gender.

I think it's important to realize & embrace that there are multiple ways of being a woman and following God's plan. I struggle with equating "motherhood" with "priesthood." Motherhood already has an equivalent - fatherhood. If my life never includes marriage, or never includes bearing biological children, I am still a mother, and I am still a nurturer. I am still a woman of God, living out my divine role, even if I never marry. I absolutely believe that motherhood is a high & holy calling - just like fatherhood is. Of all the names & titles God could have chosen for Himself, He has asked us to call Him Father! Families are the pattern of heaven, and we are preparing for that here.

Eve was called "the mother of all living" before she ever bore a biological child. Also, it takes a man & a woman to bring a physical life into the world, and those women who are never able to conceive are not any less of a woman or any less of a follower of God. It takes a man and a woman, sealed together, to bring the highest priesthood blessings into their home. I was very encouraged by Elder Oaks talk in April 2014 about women using the priesthood. I would hope that in the future we could embrace multiple ways of being a woman in the Church (and being a man in the Church) and recognize that we are all pilgrims, doing the best we can to follow God's light & live out His plan for us

I think for too long we've thought of "nurturing" as basically "playing with 3 year olds" and giving it that narrow of a definition I think is detrimental. Leadership can be a great nurturing opportunity! We do ourselves, our families, the Church, & our communities & nations a disservice when we dismiss the valuable, nurturing aspect women bring to leadership Mothering - in whatever way you are able to - will help us develop the divine nature that will allow us to enjoy the lifestyle of our Heavenly Parents

(This was also an interesting article on the "two trees" in the garden of Eden & the complementary roles of Adam & Eve in bringing to pass the salvation of the human race.)

my thoughts from a year ago: they've evolved some, but the basis remains the same.

[another essay on womanhood i enjoyed from meginprogress.com]

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

my response to Sarah Schwartz' "Rethinking the Metaphors: Deeper Conversations on Purity" [spoiler alert: i loved it]

i have watched this video six times in a row now.

it's just so good. & so important. watch:



To me, Sarah is a prime example of faithful "wrestling"

& this is a prime example of the push-back that is happening, 
& that needs to happen in our culture
because the right things are being taught
in the wrong ways.

best parts: 


"While the movement may have been largely well-intended, 

it was 100% a reaction out of fear. 
& it is easier to motivate large group of people via fear and shame 
than it is to develop holistic conversation about Christian sexual ethics. 
& so, the evangelical right sensed a generation embracing the values of the sexual revolution 
and countered with what we now know as the purity movement... 
I understand why we do this. 
Christians are alarmed by what we see as a sexually permissive society, 
and this scares us."
[I've seen this time & time again;

she's right, it's easier to motivate out of fear,

& people with good intentions

who sincerely want young people to be happy

use whatever tools they can to teach the right thing

even if it ends up being taught in the wrong way.

I honestly believe they don't mean any harm; 
it's just all they know.]



[on gender roles 
& how we tend to address boys & girls differently in this conversation]

[I strongly believe that we should have the 
same expectations of purity & modesty 

for both men & women]


"There is this sense then that if men engage in sex before marriage 
there is more grace for their actions 
because they're biologically wireto desire sex above all else."

[I have so seen & heard this, 

even if it's not in so many words. Ugh.]
{paraphrase}
If you, as a woman, 
posit that women have sexual feelings as well, 
you'll immediately be pegged as a slut. 

[Yep, felt that.

Again, my whole adolescence & adult life

I've been told that as a woman, I can't possibly understand

what a boy is going through in this area

& that their sex drive is way stronger than a woman's.

I mean, I have no real way of testing or knowing,

but I think that's a huge generalization
& a mistake

Also, that doesn't give you a free pass to promiscuity.]

"Men and women are different - like no duh, right? 
But we're both human, 
which means both men and women have a need & a capacity 
for relationships, community, and emotional health & expression,
& both men and women are wired with a desire for sexual intimacy.
This either/or logic denies all of us aspects of our humanity, and it needs to go die."

[!!!!!!!!

This is God's plan. I really believe that.

Men & women were designed to live in families]

 "I'm particularly heartbroken for the dark implications of logic for young men,
because from the moment you hit puberty you are bombarded with these messages of
"you are nothing but a slave to your desires,"
"you're human, but you're actually more like an animal when it comes to this area"
and "you really have no capacity for self control"
and "don't worry no one really expects anything else from you."
And guys need to start getting offended by that.
You are fully human, 
made in the image of God, 
with a need for relationships and emotional health and connection. 
You are not animals."

[I have three wonderful brothers who live as proof positive 

that boys are humans, not animals.]

"And so when people say things like "boys will be boys," 
ask yourself, could this sentence easily be
"boys will be terrible," 
because that's generally what people are saying."

[Oh snap.]

"And girls, you have a body.
You are in possession of a sexuality 
& having sexual desires doesn't make you a freak, 
it means you have a pulse,
and you don't need to be afraid or ashamed of that."

[Denying reality when talking to young people

means that when we do encounter reality -

and we will -

we think we're the only ones who feel this way

& we don't know how to deal with it.

A huge mistake, if you ask me.]

"We need to examine the ways we have been taught to think about sex, 
because our current framework is extremely damaging 
& doesn't actually reflect the reasons 
why Christ has called us to save sex for marriage in the first place."
[I am a huge believer 
in doing the right things
for the right reasons -
the reasons Christ Himself set up
& not the reasons we've invented
so that things make sense to us.]

"Abstaining outside marriage is about your whole life,
sexuality included,
being submitted to Christ in loving obedience.
This practice is about your discipleship,
not some hypothetical future someone.
Your virginal state or lack thereof is not an object
that you are giving someone in the future
(because there may not be someone in the future.)"
[!!!!!
Again, you can't offer a future relationship as a prize
because the fact is,
not all of us are going to get married.
Yes, marriage is a wonderful, divinely ordained goal.
But it is not - cannot - be the main reason.
Because not all of us will attain that in this life.]

"We practice chastity out of love for Christ."
[Again, love for God,
needs to be the main motivation here
because that's so much more powerful & lasting.]

"This way of thinking is big enough for all of us, right?
Whether you're married, or dating, or single,
whether you're straight or same-sex attracted,
this framework's end goal is being more like Jesus,
not some person.
This is about your sanctification.
Stewarding your sexuality your whole life for the glory of God."
[This is so important.
Again, in a church with a rapidly changing demographic
we need to keep in mind that not everyone in the congregation is married
or even heterosexual.
Truth applies to everyone,
not just those who fit the norm.
Being more like Jesus is the real purpose of life, anyways
& if you frame it that way
it applies to all of us
not just those who fit the norm.]

"Also, can we please stop treating marriage like this magical, like finish line, where it's like
"Whoo I got married!"so you never have to think about stewarding your sexuality wisely ever again?
I'm not married, but I'm assuming you're still gonna have to use wisdom,
and be prayerful,
and like, be a thinking human person afterwards."

"The goal of our youth group too often is to produce sober virgins,
and we need to aim higher than that."

"Because I don't think necessarily getting to the altar as a virgin makes us more Christ-like.
A lot of people get to that day having not had sex
just because they were super freaked out about becoming "damaged goods,"
and then they really wrestle with having sex
because they've internalized so much shame about it,
not because they understood chastity 
as a means to be formed by the Holy Spirit,
to learn,
to be sanctified,
& to grow."
[If we teach right things in the wrong way,
we may get the right outward results
but the internal change will not be there
& that's the whole point anyways.]

"Because we can obey all kinds of rules and still not be like Jesus, right?
The Pharisees love to come to Jesus and quiz him about specifics of the law
but Jesus is always bringing them back to the attitudes of their hearts
from which your actions will necessarily flow."

"What makes us like Christ is having hearts that long to see and treat others as image-bearers of God,
to love them better than we love ourselves,
and to honor God with every aspect of our beings."

"So yes, regard sexual intimacy as something to be shared in a covenant relationship of marriage,
but don't do it because you're terrified of becoming damaged goods.
Do it out of love for Christ
 and so that the Spirit can have His way in your heart
and produce everything in you that you need
 for life 
and for godliness."
[Love, not fear.
Love, not fear.
Love, not fear.
Love, not fear.]
{here i paraphrase}

Objectifying women and men
even in a benevolent way
is still objectifying them.
We are not gum.
We are not flowers.
We are not tape.
We are children of God
& that is where our true value lies.


[This last part is just really beautiful.]

"My prayer is that the Spirit of God would meet you
right where you are,
and in the way that only He can,
wrestle with you in the midst of your questions
 and your doubts
 and your fears
and restore to you a knowledge of your worth.

May you begin the process of breaking free from the lies that the Enemy would love to hold you captive in,
and may you taste and walk in the freedom of your belovedness.
May you be transformed from the inside out.
Like the Apostle John says, may your lives be ones perfectly formed in love rather than fear.
And may you be brave enough to let other people in,
to work through these issues in community.
May you surround yourself with people who will love you well
and speak the truth frequently 
and loudly 
over your life.

Let us be a force of healing
by reshaping this conversation,
by committing to viewing each person that we come in contact with 
with a holy reverence,
knowing them to be a beloved image-bearer 
& fellow child of God,
a full human person,
not an object
& not goods, damaged or otherwise

May we be a community that not only loves much
but loves well

& let us always, always remember & proclaim 
that it has never, ever been our behavior that makes us pure,
but an acknowledgement 
of who Jesus is and His purity
that makes us one with Him
& compels us to walk 
in the Way Everlasting.

women & the priesthood

~ in case you didn't know by now ~

i'm a mormon

& i love it :)

one of my absolute favorite things recently has been modern revelation
or the idea that Christ lives & leads His Church through His authorized servants
{same as in Bible times}

this has offered me a lot of peace & clarity

especially as I've watched the Christian world struggle with enormous & important issues

the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints {aka mormon church} has not been exempt from a lot of these issues




but an advantage I feel is that this is not a church led by humans
but by God acting through humans


& mortals are an imperfect filter through which the perfection of the gospel must be poured

& there is a lot of cultural imperfections & things i would change in the Church

because that's just what happens when a bunch of humans get together



swept about by the whims of men & society

brings peace to my soul


my job is to go directly to the source - to pray & ask God to confirm to me the words of His servants
& then to act in faith.


this is why my feminism differs when it comes to my faith

i believe that this is Christ's church
& He gets to make the rules

I believe in asking questions in a faith-filled way
I believe in revelation.


~ all that being said ~ 

about a year ago [10.16.13] i was serving in wisconsin as a mormon missionary

& thinking a lot about women & the priesthood

& this is what i wrote in the middle of the night one night

"aspiring for/demanding the priesthood is really degrading to womanhood -- 
you're basically saying that womanhood, 
with all of it's attendant rights & privileges, 
is somehow inferior to/not as great as manhood, 
with all of its attendant rights & privileges. 

God knows what He is doing. 
He knows me 
& He knows you, 
& He knows what each of us need to progress towards perfection. 

i do not believe that God gave men the priesthood because they're naturally horrible stinkers who wouldn't serve otherwise, anymore than i believe God gave women motherhood {which, you don't have to be a birthmother to possess the qualities of & be a mother... it's inherent, foreordained like the priesthood} because women are naturally horrible & wouldn't serve otherwise. 

Women are great leaders, & men are great nurturers, & each of us is different. 
God knows us individually. 
He knows our needs, & He knows our talents. 
He has designed men & women to need one another, in beautiful similitude of all mankind's desperate need for a Savior <3 
There is no greater advocate of women than Jesus Christ, whose church this is. 
Trust Him who knows & loves us best. 
Trust that He loves you & knows what He's doing :)" 


since then, my thoughts have evolved & grown & been added to, but the basis remains the same. 
God knows me, He loves me, & He leads His church in the way that I need. 

:)
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...